RFP ScoreBid evaluation & RFP scoring: Every bid, judged against the RFP it answers.
Every technical, commercial and compliance response scored against your weighted RFP criteria, with a citation behind each score and a normalized, consensus-ready scorecard your auditor can defend.
A 30-minute working session, then a proof of concept on your own data — both at no cost. A specialist responds within one business day.
- Days, not weeks
- Evaluation cycle on large, multi-package tenders
- Every score cited
- Each criterion linked to a line in the proposal
- One weighted rubric
- Technical · commercial · compliance on one axis
Industries
Oil & gas refining · Petrochemicals & chemicals · EPC & turnkey projects · Power & utilities · Metals, mining & cement · Public-sector & PSU tenders
Works with
PDF proposals · Weighted rubric
Built for
CPOs & procurement heads · Tender & contracts teams · PSU & government procurement cells · Infrastructure & EPC bid teams
A spreadsheet or an expert panel. Neither leaves a trail.
Approach A
Spreadsheet scoring
Each evaluator fills a grid by hand. Weightings drift, scores aren't comparable, and “why did this vendor win” has no paper trail.
Approach B
Consulting / TPE panel
An expert panel scores in a room. Costly, slow, and a point-in-time opinion you can't re-run when scope or the vendor set changes.
humaineeti
RFP Score
An AI rubric scores every proposal against your criteria — a citation behind each score and a full audit trail. Consistent, explainable, re-runnable.
How it runs
Each stage, and what it hands to the next.
- 01
Ingest
RFP criteria and vendor proposals in, as PDFs.
- 02
Extract
Requirements matched to the bid text that answers them.
- 03
Score
Weighted rubric applied, cited per criterion.
- 04
Normalize
Evaluator consensus with outlier and bias flags.
- 05
Rank & defend
A ranked shortlist plus the audit pack behind it.
At a glance
Side by side, on the things that decide it.
Swipe the table to compare
| Spreadsheet | Expert panel | RFP Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Every score cited to the source proposal page | No | No | Yes |
| Consistent weighting across all evaluators | No | No | Yes |
| Technical, commercial & compliance on one rubric | No | Yes | Yes |
| Re-run instantly when scope or vendors change | No | No | Yes |
| Outlier & bias flags on inconsistent scoring | No | No | Yes |
| Full audit trail for procurement governance | No | No | Yes |
If the right-hand column is what you need, prove it on your own data at no cost.
Inside the product
What it actually runs.
One weighted rubric across every evaluation axis
Swipe the diagram
Evidence-based bid scoring — RFP to ranked shortlist
Swipe the diagram
Included free · Demo + PoC
Score one closed tender on evidence — compare it to what you decided.
One past tender · your rubric · no cost
How it runs
- You pick a closed tender and share the RFP plus the bids received
- We build your weighted rubric and run the full evaluation
- You compare the cited scorecard against the decision you actually made
What you provide
- One RFP document and the bid responses received
- Your evaluation criteria and weightings
- 60 minutes with an evaluator to calibrate the rubric
What you get back
- A normalized scorecard with a citation behind every score
- Outlier and bias flags across evaluation axes
- An audit pack you can put in front of a governance committee
The demo and the PoC come together, at no cost. You keep the findings whether or not you go ahead — no licence, no commitment, no procurement paperwork to start.
Before you ask us
Where it runs, what it touches, what it costs.
- Where does it run?
- In your environment or ours, as your procurement governance requires. Bid documents can stay inside your boundary for the whole evaluation.
- What can it change without us?
- Nothing. It produces a cited, normalized scorecard. The committee scores, decides and signs — the engine never awards anything.
- Is our data used to train models?
- No. Tenders and bids are commercially sensitive. They are used for your evaluation only.
- What does it cost after the first tender?
- Scoring one closed tender is free. Production is priced per tender or per annual programme — scoped on the call.
Does AI decide who wins the tender?
No. RFP Score produces a cited, normalized scorecard; the committee decides. Its job is to make sure the scoring is consistent, evidence-based and defensible.
How is a score justified to an auditor?
Every criterion is linked to the specific line in the proposal it was scored from, and the full evaluation is logged. “Why did this vendor win” has an answer with a page reference.
What happens when scope or the vendor set changes?
You re-run it. Weights, criteria and vendors can change and the whole evaluation regenerates — something a spreadsheet round or an expert panel cannot do without starting over.
Can it handle multi-package tenders?
Yes — technical, commercial and compliance axes sit on one weighted rubric, which is exactly where large multi-package tenders usually lose comparability.
RFP Score
Score your next tender on evidence.
How it works and about humaineeti
How it works
One free engagement. Then production.
01Free
The demo
30 minutes on your use case, with the product open.
02Free
The proof of concept
Scoped to your own data. The findings are yours either way.
03
Production, governed
Approval gates, audit trails and data residency, in your environment.
About humaineeti
Agentic, but accountable.
humaineeti — human + AI + neeti — engineers agentic AI for the enterprise from Mumbai and Kolkata. Ten solutions, and custom builds held to the same standard.
- Evidence, not assertion
- A human on the gate
- Your cloud, your data
- Auditable by design